Kaksvarvaslaisik ei ole nii fotogeeniline kui tema kolme varbaga
liigikaaslane ning välimus ei ole neil ainus erinevus. Nii on kaksvarbad
öise eluviisiga (kolmvarbad päevasega), neil on vähem selgroolülisid ja oluliselt rohkem ribisid, nende käed ja jalad on sama pikad (kolmvarbal
käed selgelt pikemad) ja nad on omnivoorid (kolmvarbad aga rangelt
taimetoitlased). Aga neil on ka midagi ühist - neid on džunglist
praktiliselt võimatu leida, sest loomad on reeglina kõrgel puu otsas ja
ei liiguta. Teisalt - kui sa ta juba korra üles leiad, siis võid
rahulikult looma mittemidagitegemist nautida ja pildistada, sest... nad
endiselt ei liiguta. Manuel Antonio rahvuspark, Costa Rica.
Hoffmann's two-toed sloth is not as photogenic as its relative
three-toed sloth and the looks is not the only difference. Two-toed
sloths are nocturnal (threes are diurnal), they have
less vertebrae and much more ribs, they have arms that are
about the same size as their legs (threes have much longer arms than
legs) and they are omnivores (threes are strictly vegetarians). But
they do have something in common - it is close to impossible to find
them in the jungle as they are high up on trees and they do not move.
On the other hand - if you are lucky and see one, then you can take
your time and observe the animal not doing anything as... well, it
does not move. Manuel Antonio National Park, Costa Rica.
Kommentaare ei ole:
Postita kommentaar